10 comments
10 Comments:
Is that you in the picture? Doesn't look like it. Who you trying to kid?
Dear Ms. Kross,
Hello! Let me say outright that I am not a fan and that I have never seen any of your movies. Indeed, to be honest, I'm not much into pornography. However, I did discover your blog a few days ago and ended up reading a lot of your postings (at least those freely available). I have been really impressed by how intelligent, well-read and well-written you are, and by your commitment to things like your animals and your schoolwork. (Given that I am in the educational sector myself, this is particularly impressive to me!) You come across as a very sensible and intelligent young woman who is doing what she wants to do and really enjoys it. I can't criticize that, though I must admit to an ongoing uncertainty around questions re: the morality of pornography. These are not questions that I have settled for myself - I think that I can see the multiple and complex issues attached to the debate and, even after 20 years, I find myself unable to come to many conclusions on the subject, beyond adopting a general live and let live attitude.
I just wanted to touch on your past two blog postings: the first, concerning the woman who left porn and badmouthed it on the way out the door: I understand your perspective, but it does seem to me that the reasons someone gets involved in this industry may be quite distinctive. Maybe this other woman entered porn for reasons of her own and found that the industry did not live up to her expectations or made her issues worse. I agree that she should have known what she was getting into, but it is surprising how many times people lack the self-awareness to know what is in their best interests.
Your second blog I thought was very wise. Romantic love is the pursuit of fantasy. And you are quite right to point out that we do things in romantic relationships that we would never usually do. It is a humbling experience to find out, at times, that you are not quite the person you thought you were.
Anyway, I've been thinking of just dropping you a line to say how taken I was with your blogging. Sorry for blathering on and good luck in your career and into the future.
The best relationships are about fire. You illuminate the darkness or all that needs light in your life. Then you set the night on fire. Then you keep the light burning for as long as you can. Unfortunately, except in very rare cases, the candle's fuse is only so long and eventually will burn out. Fortunately, there are plenty more candles and matches to go around. The only barrier is selecting the proper ones for your life. Love and true relationships are fire.
Hi Kayden
big brother..Kayden
Kayden,
I love you, but I hope that was a joke about wanting to institute book burnings.
Not disagreeing that there's a lot of crap out there (I'd put the "Left Behind" series, and Bill O'Reilly way ahead of Clancy and Steele in the queue), but I would hope that given the fact you a) love to read b) love to write c) appear to have the ability to evaluate ideas and think for yourself, and d) love America means that you would be pro-First Amendment and anti- any form of censorship.
The book you're reading on the new economic models being forced by the internet looks really good. It's in my stack. For more recreational stuff, have you discovered Janet Evanovich? Female protagonist, decent mysteries, really great supporting cast and funny as hell.
If you ever want to start a blog sharing ideas from, and recommendations for, books, let me know. I'll be there.
PS You must be a believer in the open marketplace of ideas, why else would you continue to let Grant drivel on. Or maybe that's dribble.
First off, I’m no psych major, so if you’ve got any insights/criticisms of my theory, I’d appreciate hearing them, Kayden. :)
I think the problem with “chemistry” as you’ve described it, is that it isn’t REAL romantic chemistry in the first place. The reason girls seem to wind up with bad boyfriends is because they’re entering those relationships under what I call “emotional illusions.” Take two hypothetical guys: Guy 1 is smart, clean-cut, responsible, and friendly. Guy 2 isn’t particularly bright, is a bit shabby, isn’t good with responsibilities, and doesn’t seem to get along very well with others. If both guys try their hand at entering a relationship with the same girl, she’s going to decide which guy she has better “chemistry” with before making her choice. When she talks to Guy 1, she feels like he’s sane, reliable, friendly and, above all, comforting. When she talks to Guy 2, he doesn’t seem easy to understand. He feels like he might be dangerous or reckless or unpredictable. Above all, he strikes her as exciting.
Excitement has a very close relationship with sex. When you’re excited, your heart beats faster than normal; your breathing is shallower; your body trembles with nerves; and you might even perspire a bit. When you have sex, your heart beats faster; your breathing is shallow; your body shivers and shakes; and you get sweaty. To sum it up: Comfort = non-sexual, Excitement = sexual. Non-sexual = friend material, sexual = boyfriend material.
Love isn’t something that can be logic-ed into. Guy 1 can’t tell this girl, “Listen, I’m smart, funny, talented, have a great job, and intend to treat you much better than Guy 2 ever would.” If she doesn’t feel “chemistry” with Guy 1, he can hurl as many big helpings of logic at her as he’d like and it’s not going to change her mind. The problem with relying on these emotional illusions, is that there’s no way she can even HAVE chemistry with EITHER guy in the first place. Fake chemistry sounds like this, “We’ve only been on a few dates, but I can already tell… he’s the one!” Real chemistry sounds more like this, “We’ve only been dating for a year or so, but I can already tell… he’s the one!” Real chemistry takes time. People are complex creatures. Basing a guy’s value as a boyfriend on very little information and a truckload of feelings isn’t at all a good way to find “Mr. Right.” A nice guy can become exciting. A bad boy can become predictable and lose his excitement. The only way to find out is by really getting to know them before relying on any feelings of chemistry.
And then… well.. then there are the psychos out there like the guy you’re talking about, Kayden. This is the same freak that got you in trouble with the law and claimed you stole his dog, right? My theory: he’s a crazy dick. No criticism for THAT theory, huh? ;D
-Ben
Well the picture was creepy with the other dude getting off in the background, it was just an odd picture. Haha obviously you're not going to cater to me, one of the underlings, nor would I expect it. If you actually who or what I am I may get a little more props in this wacky internet world, but I prefer anonymity in this regard, hence why I asked the email thing, regardless I actually wanted to spar with you intellectually. You seem kind of interesting and in my summer boredom I merely wanted to ask your opinion on topics other than porn, life in general frankly.
You women seem to be such a mystery in some regards, and I could probably learn something from you.
I think Kaijen probably has it nailed. Unfortunately, I'm always Guy 1, with the additional asset of "not very good looking."
Actually, there are some recent university studies that back this stuff up. Which is why, Grant, I find myself on this blog and not on an island paradise with Ms. Perfect.
Hey, if I have to have a stand in for my nonexistent lover, I figure I can't do any better than Kayden, right?
Does this mean that you, Ms. Kayden, have found that special someone that you are crazy in love with?
Post a Comment
<< Home